Restoration and maintenance of a church often cost millions, as seen in the restoration work on the Gothic Dom Tower in Utrecht.

From Free to Fee: Should Sacred Spaces Remain Open to All?

This past summer, I found myself wandering through the picturesque villages of Tuscany, Italy. Naturally, I couldn’t resist visiting iconic cathedrals like the Duomo of Siena. Long queues? No surprise. But the hefty entrance fee (€ 21,-) did catch me off guard. A sharp contrast to France, where church doors are open for free. Well, for now. French Minister of Culture Rachida Dati has proposed a €5 entrance fee for visitors to the newly renovated Notre-Dame. A reasonable price, or a slippery slope?

Sign up for free!

Sign up for LuxLetters – the monthly newsletter that keeps you updated on new content at churchheritage.eu.

By subscribing, you sign up for our monthly newsletter for free, featuring the latest LUX content and travel tips, and you agree to our privacy statement.

Join LuxLetters, about gothic architecture and cathedrals

Churches have long been free sanctuaries—places of quiet reflection and spiritual solace. Yet, across Europe, more and more cathedrals are adding an entry fee to their grand portals. Think €26 for the Sagrada Familia in Barcelona or £30 for Westminster Abbey in London. Even in France, a country where most church buildings have been free to visit, the winds of change are blowing. What’s driving this shift, and how does it impact both visitors and the future of these grand monuments?

Amiens Cathedral notre-dame - facade
Striking facade of the Cathedral Notre-Dame of Amiens. Photo: Creative Commons

The Colossal Costs of Restoration

Maintaining centuries-old cathedrals is no small task—it’s a Herculean financial effort. Take Amiens Cathedral, a Gothic marvel that has seen its fair share of restorations. In recent years, the French government has poured tens of millions of euros into preserving its iconic stained glass and intricate façades. Without these investments, such structures would quickly crumble into disrepair.

And it’s not just Amiens. France is home to a staggering 42,000 Catholic churches, cathedrals, and monasteries, with 5,000 already in significant states of disrepair. Around 500 are in such dire condition that they’re closed to the public. Experts estimate that a whopping €760 million is needed to bring these crumbling buildings back to life.

To put that in perspective: restoring Notre-Dame de Paris alone came with a price tag of approximately €700 million. Yes, for just one church—but one that draws 15 million visitors annually. Minister Dati argues that a €5 entrance fee could generate €75 million a year, enough to bankroll an ambitious plan to preserve religious heritage across France. In her words (Le Figaro), “Notre-Dame could save all the churches in France. It would be a magnificent symbol.”

Notre-Dame de Paris on Fire, 2019
Notre-Dame de Paris on Fire, 2019. Photo: Shutterstock

A Symbolic Solution, or a Controversial One?

While the idea sparked debate, it ultimately did not move forward, leaving the funding for maintenance dependent on other sources such as donations and public funding. France’s Catholic Church strongly opposes entrance fees, arguing that churches should remain open to all, regardless of belief, opinion, or financial means.

They point to the 1905 law separating church and state, which forbids charging entrance to public church buildings. The only loophole? Charging for access to specific sections, like the Notre-Dame’s towers—a system already in place before the 2019 fire.

Proponents of entrance fees highlight the reality: without revenue from tourists, many churches would face neglect or closure. Critics, however, insist that churches are houses of God, not cash registers. They argue that imposing fees undermines their spiritual mission.

It’s a tough choice: should we pray in a crumbling sanctuary, or pay a few euros to preserve its beauty for generations to come?

Gargouille of the Sint-Jan Cathedral
The ravages of time take their toll on many Gothic churches, such as the St. John’s Cathedral in 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.

The Changing Landscape of Church Funding

Historically, churches relied on private donations and religious institutions for funding. Governments occasionally chipped in, but public budgets for cultural and heritage projects have dwindled in recent decades. Many European countries, including France, have slashed their subsidies for cultural preservation.

To adapt, some churches are testing hybrid models: keeping main access free but charging for specific areas, like the Notre-Dame’s towers or the Kölner Dom’s treasury. These approaches strike a balance, allowing worshippers to pray freely while inviting history buffs to contribute to maintenance. 

Voluntary donations, such as those at Utrecht’s Dom Church, are also proving effective. After all, the biblical principle of giving what you can afford remains as relevant as ever.

View on the choir of the Domkerk Utrecht, with the grand Batz-organ in the back.
View on the choir of the Domkerk Utrecht, with the grand Batz-organ in the back. Photo: LUX

Who Pays for Church Maintenance in Europe?

The Netherlands Churches bear the brunt of their maintenance costs, supported by donations and tourist income. Government subsidies, like the Heritage Act’s SIM program, play a helpful supporting role.

Belgium Local church councils manage upkeep with municipal subsidies. For major renovations, regional heritage funds step in.

France Churches built before 1905 belong to the state or municipalities, which often handle maintenance. Post-1905 churches rely entirely on private funding.

England Responsibility lies with the Church of England, which depends on donations, fundraising, and grants from organizations like the Heritage Lottery Fund.

Germany The Kirchensteuer (church tax) provides a stable income, complemented by state and federal support for historically significant churches.

Italy Both the Vatican and the Italian government contribute to maintenance, with local authorities funding key restorations.

Spain Churches rely on donations and tourist revenue, with government subsidies for culturally significant sites.

Striking a Balance Between the Sacred and the Financial

The debate over entrance fees for churches is far from over. It’s a delicate balancing act between financial necessity and the religious and cultural values tied to these buildings. As more churches transform into tourist hotspots, the call for free access grows louder, especially for those who view them as sacred refuges.

A hybrid approach may be the key to satisfying both worlds: keeping spaces accessible for the faithful while allowing tourists to contribute to their upkeep. It’s a model that respects the dual identity of these architectural masterpieces—as spiritual havens and cultural landmarks.

As for the €5 entrance fee proposed for Notre-Dame, it ultimately didn’t make the cut. For now, France’s most iconic cathedral remains free to enter—though whether that model is sustainable for the long term remains an open question. Whether it’s €5 for Notre-Dame, €8.50 for a tower view, or a few coins dropped in a donation box, one thing is clear: preserving Europe’s churches will take creativity, compromise, and, yes, some cash.

Whether you’re climbing the Notre-Dame’s towers or marveling at the mosaics in Ravenna, remember this: God may be free, but keeping His house in shape is a costly affair. Every euro, pound, or donation helps preserve these awe-inspiring sanctuaries for the next generation. So, pay a visit, enjoy the view, and, if you can, leave a little something in the box.

What do you think? Leave your reaction below! Thank you very much!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read more:

Scroll to Top